By Prof. Bob Andoh

Many developers and municipalities have invested in filtering systems to meet the US EPA mandate for reducing these storm water runoff problems. Their experiences reveal a fundamental flaw in the design of conventional “down flow” filtration. The capital investment in these immense systems — sometimes spanning whole football fields in size — is tremendous and regular maintenance is cost-prohibitive.

By Professor Robert Andoh

Burgeoning commercial and industrial development is putting increased pressure on drainage systems. Land and vegetation act as a natural filtration system during storms. The conversion of open space to impervious materials such as roads, buildings, and parking lots increases the volume of runoff and the risk of downstream flooding. Worse, too fast an influx of water into the drain overtaxes combined sewage systems, causing untreated sewage to spill out into waterways.

Until recently, most developers and municipalities in the U.S. relied on end-of-pipe solutions such as large detention tanks, deep tunnel storage systems, and high rate treatment facilities to combat urban flooding problems. However, these large, structurally intensive systems are extremely costly to purchase and to maintain.

To alleviate these challenges, many in the U.S. are now looking to an alternative approach long relied on in Europe and the U.K. More than 16,000 vortex flow controls, also known as vortex “valves”, are installed around the world to manage water flow in stormwater storage schemes, stormwater sewers, combined sewers and wastewater treatment plants. These novel devices are useful for many applications, including inlet control and stormwater storage.

By Dr. Bob Andoh

For years municipalities around the globe have invested in stormwater treatment systems to remove pollutants from runoff. Whether they are used for stand-alone treatment or as pretreatment devices to keep our infiltration bays from clogging, these “sedimentation devices” have an important role in stormwater treatment. Yet a troubling problem has emerged and become more apparent: many proprietary treatment systems don’t hold what they catch. When flows increase, previously captured pollutants can re-suspend and discharge right out of the system. Moreover, many communities are not aware of this phenomenon — known as “washout” — leaving them with a false sense of security about the ability to keep their waterways clean.

By Robert Y.G. Andoh, Mike Faram and Dave Scott

Water industry officials throughout Europe – and in a growing number of municipalities in North America – tend to think of vortex valves as a novel technology for outlet flow control on a stormwater detention system. Most of these 17,000+ valves installed around the world are, in fact, implemented on stormwater detention schemes because use of a valve can reduce the required storage volume by up to 50% while still meeting the maximum discharge requirement. But vortex valves actually have many other uses in stormwater, wastewater and combined sewer systems. These versatile devices tackle a number of other problems, including erosion control, re-oxygenation of water and flow equalization in wastewater treatment plants.

By Kwabena Osei, MsCE

In an industry where alternative sediment and nutrient removal practices are increasingly sought, it is imperative that engineers and regulators know precisely just how efficient various Best Management Practices (BMPs) are. For many years, field testing has been the preferred method for evaluating different structural stormwater treatment systems. However, many unsuccessful or inconclusive field testing exercises have been carried out on structural BMPs over the past few years leading scientists and engineers to conclude that field testing is fraught with many obstacles and challenges that are difficult to eliminate, as well as potentially producing results that are not necessarily representative of the performances of both proprietary and non-proprietary stormwater management practices.